“Gift Of The Magi” And “The Necklace” Essay

The 2 dead stories, The gift of the Magi written by O. Henry and The necklace written by shout de Maupassant be cardinal composed of twain young, lovely women Mathilde and Della. Even though they are in different composed stories that hire similar partingistics that convey byout the romance such as, they are both emotion onlyy and financiall(a)y depressed, pee loving husbands, and both want to achieve roughthing in an total manner. Throughout much the stories on that point similarities move with each opposite, however there differences emit as hard as there will to survive through the depths of roll in the hayliness.For example, Mathilde expresses her clamant unappreciative remarks on life little(a) pleasures. She grieved over the shabbiness of her apartment, the dinginess of the walls, the played out appearance of the c hairsbreadths, the ugliness of the draperies is an example of recessive comments in which she strike ups that she should be treated homog eneous gold (de Maupassant 202). Her comments make water the fact that her drill hole of royalty should non be mistreated. though she lives in a filthy cottage, which she calls home. Her emotions on life cause g unmatched in a in truthty world where she should be treated like a king. Her envies of break away quality life style adopt turned into a disease, where she must pass the finest jewels, tapestries in the world. Her cravings of excessive attention substantiate made her gone into a kingdom of addiction. Mme. Loisel was greedy, dishonest, and did non love her husband. She was a commodious complainer who was always looking for attention, and ofttimes used people.In addition, Mathilde Loisel is a character that has much hook in her. It is her motif to act throughout the theme, and it is the key to her declivity. Mathilde d professfall comes into place when she does not tell Mrs. Forrestier that she befogged her necklace. Mathilde does not gush out confessions and prostrating herself date pleading for forgiveness, she grows the responsibility for her mistakes by replacing Mrs. Forrestiers necklace. De Maupassant shows her qualities in the introduction, the incident, and the poverty she set asideures. At the beginning of the story Mathilde superbia is so strong that she does not want to type reality. Reality meaning the husband she has and the tenuous household she resumes in. So in pitch to reject reality she turns to her stargazes in which she has the life of ease and riches. Pride comes to place when she is kick to her husband  about(predicate) the way hey live and how she deserves more than than this. When they discover that they have been invited to a big party, she feels she must live up to her arrogance.Knowing without a doubt that they have no money, she wants to have a beautiful dress and along with the dress she proceeds a radiant necklace from Mrs. Forrestier. The incident in which Mathilde loses the necklace plays an combat-ready role in Mathlides insolence. Mathilde refuses to endure embarrassment by telling Mrs. Forrestier that she confounded her necklace, so she goes and replaces the necklace. Her pride will not allow her stoop so first base into apologizing, pleading for forgiveness for nothing, instead her pride tells her that she is capable of replacing the necklace, and so she does. Her pride dreadfully leads her into destitution lifestyle, something she is not closely proud of. The reality of her life becomes more realistic than ever. She is plunged into poverty, and drudgery that will take away her prized youth and beauty, never to return, tho yet she solace has her pride.At the end after all the debts are all paid, she downs Mrs. Forrestier, who by the way does not differentiate her, tells her about the incident and what she had to do to afford the money, and discovers that the necklace was nothing more than a fake. Mathilde is a character that has a pride so strong that she doesnt notice until her pride hits her with retribution, by leading her to poverty. She sees her responsibility for losing the necklace, and she had adequacy sense of self-sacrifice to pay for restoring it. She sacrifices with pride not only her position, but in any case her youth and beauty. Pride plays a critical role in Mathilde life, role that stands strong and proud, but yet its so authoritative that it drives Mathlides fate. Furthermore, Mathilde had begun to change. Physically, she had become the strong, hard, rude, woman of misfortunate households. (209).But similarly there was a change on the inside, too. Sometimes she still sat and thought about her signifi laughingstockce of glory and then thought about what her life would have been like if she would have never lost the necklace. She realized that her self-centredness and craving to be on top had caused her to picture the major down fall that she did. She also realized that she was at rock rotter now, her and her husband both, and she had put them there. A Mathilde dream of unattainable wealth and comfort yet, fails to see that her dream life ends up harming her real life. Maupassant does and excellent job of showing the variety of Mathildes character from a individual who is selfish and ungrateful to a mortal who realizes that her mistakes and pays for it the rest of her life. Even though the story is fiction, Maupassant has made it believable and lifelike. Someone culture this story could benefit greatly from it. We all must deal with selfishness at some point in our lives. Why not learn from other peoples mistakes, fiction or not.On the other hand, Della is a thoughtful person, sacrificed their most prized possessions for one another. They did this in order to buy each other nice Christmas reachs. Dellas most prized possession was her beautiful hair that she telescoped off and sold for the money. For example, she uses her time and effort to give a thoughtful present to her loving husband. She is very much appreciative of her husband and is willing to accept him as her confidence and with this time of financial effect she uses him as a guide through the dark times and does not complain at all (203-204). Also, Della does the imaginable by cutting her long, beautiful hair to divert her husband so that he can have a Christmas to remember (203).She is a person who will not let a little downfall get in her way for her husband and her to a have a wonderful and festive celebration. She a not a selfish person, instead she is magnanimous, and considerate to the fullest extent. Even though her beauty is lost, she gained love and compassionate judgement from her husband, and it what counts more than gifts. Finally, Della is chivalrous and an honorable being. sort of uses all her might and strength to create the best Christmas ever. Lately, she is much deprived of many a(prenominal) of her daily things, however her cutting her hair makes her to care for her husband more than she cares for herself. She would sooner have her husband have a Merry Christmas, likewise for the husband.In conclusion, the short stories, The Gift of the Magi and The Necklace, deal with two womens struggles to make someone else happy and how fulfilling your own wants can hurt you. The difference in the midst of these stories is how when push came to shove, the way the characters chose to spend their money. These two interesting and ironic stories revolve virtually one main character. They both undertake to make their lives or someone elses life better by exploitation money.