Reality TV VS Real Life TV Essay

naive realism TV vs. Real Life TVOne of the main sources of news and enjoyment is boob tube. Every household has a television set in their home which the family consumes hours watching. Many world TV signals are based on shallow and vague values. The growing apparent motion in television now for our glossiness is REALITY TV (real look on TV). Just like the appeal to junk food or the internet pragmatism TV has a dominant effect on our children and us as adults. T here is real living and in that location is TV- spirit low influence of which viewing audience fall. Under the name of naturalism TV viewers expect roughlything as real life on TV. entirely while cosmos TV may seem like a harmless form of entertainment, the defile (which is done so subtly) is very efficacious and therefore it deserves a closer look. So the question is Do we rattling need a nonher reality TV show or perhaps its time for a reality check? Reality television is a genre of television program ming which generally is unscripted, documenting actual events everywhere fiction and featuring ordinary concourse over professional actors. . Reality TV has appeared following the creation of television broadcasting in the 1940s.What we know of as reality TV now started with much(prenominal) shows as Candid tv camera (1948). Reality TV programs are rapidly developing and gaining more than and more popularity changing contents of the programs according to time changes participants become more assailable to the viewerswhich attracts constant interest to reality shows. The nigh popular reality TV shows today are The Bachelor, Who Wants to Marry a Millionaire, subsister. All over the world, on multiple TV-channels, millions of people are watching the products of reality TV. Reality shows are covering most valuable aspects of life family relation mails, cacoethes, and money. The main purposes of those shows are either fun, or competition amusement. So here is the true reality beh ind reality TV. Reality TV, which is in the fear of making us feel good quite a than be good, real contributes to the growing problems in our society by celebrating human weakness rather than human excellence.Reality TV doesnt empower us, but rather overpowers us by taking our innate power and inner sharp and marrowuality away from us, leaving us whole step insecure, inadequate, less fulfilled, isolate and confused by virtue of the promotion of anti-social behavior, excessive self-indulgence, self-entitlement, greed, compromised integrity, obsession with kind at all costs, and erosion in morality. All reality shows own their own level of gossip, whatever more than others. The Housewives series are cognize for carrying with them a swirl of s nominatedal ranging from cheating husbands, missing child financial support and even suicides. Courtroom shows like Peoples Court and divorce Court also brings drama to viewers as cases of divorce, property damage and landlord ne gligence lead to explosive episodes of screaming matches and much mallet smashing. Although no(prenominal) of us wish to be tied up in such hairy messes and sticky situations, it is amusing to watch others battle it out in what contribute be diged no less than a complete vaunt of trashy behavior.We like to know what is going on behind unkindly doors and if it involves some type of controversy, that just straighten outs it all the more intriguing. The Real human being is often created with being the first reality tv show, but you can go back even further to the Fifties when Candid television camera first aired. It was a show of regular people put in adverse, funny situations and we got to see how they reacted first hand. We love Candid Camera. It ran in some form for fifteen seasons, spawned countless other shows (Americas Funniest Home Videos, Kids grade the Darndest Things and the latest, Punkd) and will probably come back in some form in the future. Americans also love g ame shows, which can be compared to reality TV shows. We love to watch people win or lose fortunes within thirty minutes and see how they react to that and each(prenominal) other. Perhaps Dr. Annette Hill, a researcher at the University of Westminster put it best when asked by BBC News why reality TV shows were so popular We gear up that, in general, people like to see what happens behind the scenes. Some shows, such as Deadliest Catch, give us a glimpse into something we might neer know about such as the dangerous lives of crab fisherman. Reality TV is at times so utterly fabricated that viewers cant help but enjoy a diametric reality from their own.Whether you favor watching reality shows of the rich and famous, the survivors, or the love birds, all anyone wants is an escape from what becomes a monotonous routine. If from such outright mind-numbing shows we can gain either steadfast motivation to become wealthy ourselves or simply affirmation that we are not as screwed up as we think (compared to the nut-jobs on the screen), then I think the hour of reality TV is well spent. Of course, everything looks better through a clear window. So, if you ready to watch reality TV smut, at least watch it on any HD service really.You can see all of their REAL wrinkles and cellulite So what does this actually say about our American culture? Some may believe that our culture can be nave and nosey. We enjoy aspect into others lives and personal business as and use to their real life dilemmas as entertainment. Its also fair to say that we are a culture that enjoys other peoples drama. The more fighting and arguing the show has the more we want to watch it. There are critics who judge reality TV and their arguments are worth of attention. Contemporary reality shows are ruinous for what they teach the audience. There is an emotional abuse when certain participants fail to win, there is a psychological trauma on the side of viewers when something happens not as they ha ve expected. Physical beauty is presented to be more authorised than cleverness and intelligence, feelings and emotions are common. If reality TV is so popular, why does most critical commentary regard in a negative percipient?Traditionally, documentary is considered a sober genre with a strong tradition of social commentary, while reality TV is seems as a minuscule one. However, the increase of new hybrids formats blurs this idea finding documentaries based on entertainment and reality shows based on social issues. New hybrid versions of documentary and reality television produce a new kind of universal sphere in which shared knowledge and the experience of the everyday form centre stage, Reality TV has broken the boundary betwixt private and public. Audience wants to feel the guilty pleasure, a voyeuristic experience, of feeling part of ordinary peoples lives and them demands to watch it on television. harmonize to Baudrillard, this idea is based on a kind of primal pleasur e, of anthropological joy in images, a kind of brute fascination unmortgaged by aesthetic, moral, social or political judgments . We have always been interested in other peoples lives because they are a upbraiding of our own lives, our own ordinariness. Baudrillard suggests that images are immoral, and that their fundamental power lies in this immorality.When you consider the magnitude of the challenges that are facing America today, it becomes obvious that what we need is for sure not another mind-numbing reality TV show, but rather a good reality check. Whether we recognize it or not, America is in dreaded need of healing and true revival. It needs a jump-start, not merely in the economy, but most importantly a jump-start in the heart and soul. After all, we are only as strong as our spirit, because when the spirit is weak its easier to become overwhelmed by what life throws our way. But when the spirit is strong, no turbulences can affect us, much like a ship in the va st ocean that can sail smoothly as long as there are no holes in it to make it sink. America could use a reality check if only to review our value system, which is out of balance and has led to social ills and failing systems and institutions. In a conflicted state of uncertainty, doubt and fear, its only natural for people to feel overwhelmed, wishing to escape from reality.However, reality TV proves only an coloured easing. Its obvious that we are looking for love (real joy, fulfillment, meaning and purpose) in all the wrong places. In a culture that demands instant gratification, and relief from everyday anxieties, a quick fix (for coping), seems to be the chosen do drugs of choice. So now for that reality check the reality is that the prevailing psyche in American society today is more is better, acquiring outside(a) riches as opposed to internal riches and that you can lead something for nothing.There is a sense of entitlement and an expectation of wanting the good life w ithout having to work hard for it. This is reinforced, glorified and perpetuated by the media with shows like The Lifestyle of The luxuriant and Famous. When all you see is glamour, but not the hard work and hold that goes into achieving success, it only inspires more envy and the desire for a get rich quick scheme leading to the erosion of morality and integrity.Works CitedBaudrillard. Represetning Reality. 1991.Bignell, J. Reality TV in the Twenty first Century. New York Plagrave MacMillan, 2005. en.wikipedia.org. N0vember 2012.Nichols, B. Representing Reality Issues and Concepts in Documentary. 1991.