Has Technology Made Strategy Obsolete? Essay -- essays research papers

Has Technology Made dodging Obsolete? It has been said that, "improvements in technology for waging war feed made schema increasingly irrelevant." This is not the lineament dodge is actually becoming more than than important with the development of more sophisticated military technology. Firstly it must be clearly delimitate how strategy and technology relate to each other. There have been umteen different views on what, in effect, constitutes strategy. If one were to compare Sun Tzus concepts of strategy and compare them to that of Clausewitz, it would be clear that the two defined strategy more than differently. Sun Tzu viewed strategy as a much larger wall plug than did the Clausewitz. He believed that an overall strategy that utilized political alliances, misinformation, intelligence and strategical planning was the key to what he believed the pinnacle of military victory was to come through the war without invariably having to fight. Clausewitz had a much narrower view of strategy, one that would more correctly be determined as tactic. Clausewitz believed in the supremacy of come up to military conflict as the sole arena for states to resolve their differences and recompense their ambitions. He focused then, on the best way to win the war, believe that war was inevitable. It is clear then, that wile both men wrote on the upshot of war, their focus was on different levels of warfare, Sun Tzus focus was on strategy, or grand strategy, while Clausewitzs focus was on the tactical level, or practicable strategy. Technology is of a different ilk altogether than the closely relate topics of tactics and strategy. Technology is the tools with which the war is waged. It can consist of not but mechanical instruments, but of nuclear, chemical and biological tools as well. Technology is an ever changing, constantly improving, element of warfare that has throughout history continually alter the efficiency with which mankind can kill one a nd other. Technology dodge Tactics The key to understanding the issue is to understand how the three elements, technology, tactics and strategy are connected to each other and more specifically, how changes in one area of pass on drive changes in the other. Technology is the karyon to the whole process. A requirement is identified and a weapon, or weapons arrangement is created in order to fill that requirement. Once this has been done, the military leader... ...s Strategic defence mechanism Initiative (SDI) or "Star Wars" plan that ultimately broke the economicalally weaker USSR. Currently, the US Armys is driving toward the development of a Strategic Anti-missile System resent successful tests of this new technology raise the specter of a provide to the winnable war scenario. These new technologies has, as all technology is, been developed to finally and directly eliminate the threat generated by initial development of the nuclear strike capability. The question t hat now begs to be asked is weather this technology will once again change the strategic focus away from the economic arena and back to the military one? Technology has not rendered strategy obsolete. Certain military technological advances, which are continually reshaping the tactical realm, have managed, by the shear magnitude of their impact, reached beyond that area to change the Grande Strategy by which nations plan their success. As we see, strategy changed in order to predict the threat posed until a counter technology was developed. The interplay of tactics, technology and strategy is cyclical and symbiotic in nature with each element cosmos driven by changes in the other.