Research, Writing & Civil Litigation Assignment 1 Essay

For the first assignment, try these sententious questions involving legal research1. Please enter the correct citation for the imperative judicatory case of Lamb against California, which was decided on January 7, 1963 and is recorded on page 234 of volume 371 in the United call downs Reporter. Lamb V. California, 371 U. S. 234 (1963).2. Please inclining all of the courts whose ratiocinations are binding upon the national district court for the territory of Massachusetts. Circuit dallys of Appeal, and the U.S. Supreme.3. From the following sources of law within our legal system, list them in the order of close to binding to least binding (assume all manifold laws are valid) and explain why that order exists. a. declare constitutionb. federal constitutionc. narrate legislationd. federal legislation disposition The last document that gives governments their authority also serves to limit governmental authority, to protect well-bred rights, etc. Other laws, judicial decis ions and executive actions must be unvarying with the applicable constitution or it falls to the courts to strike down (law, decision or action). Statutes Law written by federal and state legislatures. They aim effective upon signature of the president (federal) or governor (state). Statues of limitations Federal and state laws prescribing the maximum period of time during which various types of civil actions nd roughshod prosecutions empennage be brought after the occurrence of the injury or offense. victory Clause A clause in Article VI of the U.S. Constitution that declares federal laws to have jurisdictional authority over state laws in the event there is conflict between laws established by 2 governing bodies.4. In what types of cases and/or memos would you be most likely to boot caselaw that is not mandatory authority? Determining when a courts decision is mandatory or convincing whoremonger be tricky, given the multiple jurisdictions throughout the country and the la yers of courts within to each one jurisdiction. Our court systems are founded on the belief that there should be fairness, consistency, and predictability in judicial decision making. The doctrine that expresses this concept is labeled stare decisis. In essence, stare decisis considers mandatory, or binding, an existing decision from any court that exercises appellant jurisdiction over another court, unless the lower court can come out that the decision is clearly wrong or is distinguishable from the case at hand.Courts frequently consider the larger circumstance when choosing among persuasive decisions. A regular(prenominal) situation in which decisions from one state may be exceedingly persuasive on another is where both(prenominal) states share a specialized doctrine. For slip, Texas courts may find decisions of Wisconsin courts in marital property cases quite persuasive because both states adhere to community property law. Rarely would either state consult its neighbori ng states on marital property law both have neighbors that are common-law marital property states. In most other situations, however, Texas courts might find Oklahoma or Arkansas decisions more(prenominal) persuasive than those of Minnesota or Illinois (Wisconsins neighbors), because demographic, geographic, or historic similarities may have led to the development of similar legal doctrines among neighboring states.Similarly, whether a state has adopted a particular uniform law can affect the persuasiveness of its decisions. Federal courts, too, look at the larger context when choosing among the range of persuasive decisions to consult.And For good measure, to save the hardest for last5. Give an example of a case where the U.S. Supreme Court would be deciding an geld of STATE law.The Justices must exercise considerable discretion in deciding which cases to hear, since more than 10,000 civil and criminal cases are filed in theSupreme Court each year from the various state and feder al courts. The Supreme Court also has original jurisdiction in a very junior-grade number of cases arising out of disputes between States or between a State and the Federal Government.Bintliff, B. MANDATORY V. PERSUASIVE CASES. West Group Retrieved 2001 from http//faculty.law.lsu.edu/toddbruno/mandatory_v__persuasive.htm McWay, D. (2008).Workings of the American Legal System. Legal and Ethical Aspects of Health Information Management (third edition). 2008 Delmar Cengage learning.