Twelve Angry Men Plot Essay -- essays research papers

Plot xii Angry Men is an interesting and exciting jury-room confrontation in which an " r from each one and shut case" becomes strenuous as twelve strangers scuffle for answers. The examination involves a nineteen-year-old boy, who is suspect of killing his father in a late-night fracas with an extraordinary knife. His fate now lies in the hands of 12 jurors, each with his own determination to solve the case and reveal the truth. As the school term takes its course, evidence becomes scrutinised, tempers rise, and the jury room erupts in a shouting belt because one such juror finds just doubts in the two testimonies that were deemed conceivable enough to convict. In his fight for an acquittal, the singled out juror found that the protection evidence was not only unreliable, but the timely fashion in which both the man and the woman alleged to have seen and heard the suspect were by far insufficient. Upon reaction to his vote, the dubious jurors immediately began quest ioning the man, not understanding how he could possibly think that way. Nevertheless, the adamant juror held his undercoat and the votes were 11 guilty, and 1 not guilty, but the decision had to be unanimous. quotation First there were those that couldnt care less about the outcome, then there was Davis, the tenacious juror who held a firm grip onto the possibility of reasonable doubt in the case. He demonstrated his personal strength of melodic theme and tried eliminating any individual prejudices for the best po...