Criminal Trial Process Paper :: essays research papers

Criminal Trial Process PaperIntroductionIn Canada, our criminal trial process is based around an adversarial corpse. What this means is that the disputants be instituteed by professionals in the field of law. These professionals are called lawyers. The lawyers work so that the truth of the trial is brought forward and rightness is served for the greater community. In the adversarial system it is believed that the search for truth is beat out served by the parties themselves, through and through their lawyers and not through the judge. This means that lawyers determine the issue in dispute and decide the best way to argue them. Judges cosmopolitanly play a rattling passive role in the trial process. Their job is merely to ensure a fair trial for the incriminate, and to make an unbiased, neutral decision at the end of the trial. This decision is based upon the evidence brought forward by the ii teams of lawyers during the criminal trial.Key PlayersIn the adversarial system th ere are three, and sometimes four refer players that make up the criminal trial process. These key players are the Crown attorney, the defence attorney and the judge or justice or the court. There is however in some cases juries involved in the trial process as well. The Crown attorney represents what is seen as the force or queen of the country, however they in actual fact represent the police officers and other law enforcers as well as the general globe. The Crown has a very difficult and incubusing job. They must find the incriminate, which is the soulfulness being charged, guilty of committing the crime. This decision must be considered and thought to be without a reasonable doubt. Reasonable doubt is a very voiceless concept to define. It is based around the golden thread of English law, the accused is presumed innocent until proven guilty by his or her accuser. The courts, themselves can not even come up with an exact definition, but have attempt their best through thi s explanation. The concept of whether or not the general public would see as a calmative group a bona fide and required sterilise on the situation. This limit must be logical and for the purpose of a greater good. Thus the Crown attorney carries an extremely heavy burden when attempting to find the accused guilty of his or her charges. This is thought to give the accused the fairest trial possible.